Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?

Spinu, Arsenie Dan; Marcu, Radu Dragos; Socea, Bogdan; Diaconu, Camelia Cristina; Scarneciu, Ioan; Scarneciu, Camelia; Bodean, Oana Maria; Dragomirescu, Razvan Ion Florin; Stanescu, Ana Maria Alexandra; Mischianu, Dan Liviu Dorel; Bratu, Ovidiu Gabriel

Arsenie Dan Spinu, Radu Dragos Marcu, Bogdan Socea, Camelia Cristina Diaconu, Ioan Scarneciu, Camelia Scarneciu, Oana Maria Bodean, Razvan Ion Florin Dragomirescu, Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu, Dan Liviu Dorel Mischianu, Ovidiu Gabriel Bratu

Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?

Abstract:

Ureteral stents represent a minimally invasive alternative to preserve urinary drainage whenever the ureter is damaged or is under a significant risk to be occluded due to extrinsic or intrinsic etiology, even due to iatrogenic cause. Ureteral obstruction caused by extrinsic compression is often associated with intra-abdominal neoplasms. The first-line therapy to relieve such obstructions is usually internal drainage with ureteral stents. Ureteral stents made of different materials have been designed to achieve the best drainage possible. In this study, we tried to compare different JJ stent materials - which are better and their pros and cons. The ideal stent that would combine perfect long-term efficacy with no stent-related morbidity is still lacking and stent usage is associated with several adverse effects that limit its value as a tool for long-term urinary drainage. Several new ideas on stent design, composition material and stent coating are currently under evaluation, and are trying to eliminate the drawbacks of ureteral stent usage. Almost every clinician is familiar with the drawbacks that are associated with stents, including infection, encrustation, pain and discomfort.

Keywords:
stent; materials; obstruction; composition

Issue: 2018, Volume 69, Issue 8

Pages: 2061-2063

Publication date: 2018/9/15

https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473

Download Pdf Article

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Citation Styles

Cite this article as:
SPINU, A.D., MARCU, R.D., SOCEA, B., DIACONU, C.C., SCARNECIU, I., SCARNECIU, C., BODEAN, O.M., DRAGOMIRESCU, R.I.F., STANESCU, A.M.A., MISCHIANU, D.L.D., BRATU, O.G., Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?, Rev. Chim., 69(8), 2018, 2061-2063.

Vancouver
Spinu AD, Marcu RD, Socea B, Diaconu CC, Scarneciu I, Scarneciu C, Bodean OM, Dragomirescu RIF, Stanescu AMA, Mischianu DLD, Bratu OG. Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?. Rev. Chim.[internet]. 2018 Aug;69(8):2061-2063. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473

APA 6th edition
Spinu, A.D., Marcu, R.D., Socea, B., Diaconu, C.C., Scarneciu, I., Scarneciu, C.,... Bratu, O.G. (2018). Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?. Revista de Chimie, 69(8), 2061-2063. https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473

Harvard
Spinu, A.D., Marcu, R.D., Socea, B., Diaconu, C.C., Scarneciu, I., Scarneciu, C., Bodean, O.M., Dragomirescu, R.I.F., Stanescu, A.M.A., Mischianu, D.L.D., Bratu, O.G. (2018). 'Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?', Revista de Chimie, 69(8), pp. 2061-2063. https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473

IEEE
A.D. Spinu, R.D. Marcu, B. Socea, C.C. Diaconu, I. Scarneciu, C. Scarneciu, O.M. Bodean, R.I.F. Dragomirescu, A.M.A. Stanescu, D.L.D. Mischianu, O.G. Bratu, "Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?". Revista de Chimie, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2061-2063, 2018. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473

Text
Arsenie Dan Spinu, Radu Dragos Marcu, Bogdan Socea, Camelia Cristina Diaconu, Ioan Scarneciu, Camelia Scarneciu, Oana Maria Bodean, Razvan Ion Florin Dragomirescu, Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu, Dan Liviu Dorel Mischianu, Ovidiu Gabriel Bratu,
Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?,
Revista de Chimie,
Volume 69, Issue 8,
2018,
Pages 2061-2063,
ISSN 2668-8212,
https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473.
(https://revistadechimie.ro/Articles.asp?ID=6473)
Keywords: stent; materials; obstruction; composition

RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?
A1 - Spinu, Arsenie Dan
A2 - Marcu, Radu Dragos
A3 - Socea, Bogdan
A4 - Diaconu, Camelia Cristina
A5 - Scarneciu, Ioan
A6 - Scarneciu, Camelia
A7 - Bodean, Oana Maria
A8 - Dragomirescu, Razvan Ion Florin
A9 - Stanescu, Ana Maria Alexandra
A10 - Mischianu, Dan Liviu Dorel
A11 - Bratu, Ovidiu Gabriel
JF - Revista de Chimie
JO - Rev. Chim.
PB - Revista de Chimie SRL
SN - 2668-8212
Y1 - 2018
VL - 69
IS - 8
SP - 2061
EP - 2063
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473
KW - stent
KW - materials
KW - obstruction
KW - composition
ER -

BibTex
@article{RevCh2018P2061,
author = {Spinu Arsenie Dan and Marcu Radu Dragos and Socea Bogdan and Diaconu Camelia Cristina and Scarneciu Ioan and Scarneciu Camelia and Bodean Oana Maria and Dragomirescu Razvan Ion Florin and Stanescu Ana Maria Alexandra and Mischianu Dan Liviu Dorel and Bratu Ovidiu Gabriel},
title = {Ureteral JJ Stent - Which One is Better?},
journal = {Revista de Chimie},
volume = {69},
number = {8},
pages = {2061-2063},
year = {2018},
issn = {2668-8212},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.18.8.6473},
url = {https://revistadechimie.ro/Articles.asp?ID=6473}
}

<<<< back

PUBLISHING SECTION

Author Guidelines

* Paper Drafting

* Paper Template

* Ethical Statement

* Paper Submission

Ghidul Autorului (ro)

Open Access & Archiving Policy

Search Authors

LATEST NEWS
	NUMAR OMAGIAL PETRU PONI.. detalii
	Revista de Chimie - 70 de ani de aparitie neintrerupta.. detalii
	English-Romanian Dictionary for Mechanical Engineering (download pdf)